Written by Nestor Lim
Edited by Rich Tijam
The Supreme Court has ruled that sari-sari stores earning minuscule profits should be meted with fewer money claim awards for equity than larger enterprises.
In the recent case of Cabug-os vs. Espina, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) awarded a total of PhP 678,804.69, inter alia, to Teresita Espina, who was proven to be illegally dismissed as a 'tindera' or sales lady of the sari-sari store of Dominga Cabug-os. The NLRC computed the amount as follows:
Backwages: Php 298,539.15Cabug-os raised that this amount is six times her store's inventory and would likely bankrupt her.
Court found this award excessive.
The High Court said that the State recognizes the societal ubiquity and informal nature of the sari-sari stores and that they are micro retail enterprises operated mainly by family members and are established on a very meager capital. While the informal sector employees deserve all the protection given to their counterparts working in the formal sector, "the protection should not come at the expense of impoverishing those who rely on minuscule profits to get by."
Furthermore, the NLRC cannot expect a sari-sari store / 'tindahan' with such minuscule profits to apply the same labor conditions as a multinational corporation.
Hence, the Court has ordered that Dominga Cabug-os pay Teresita Espina her salaries from November 18, 2012, to December 19, 2014, at a rate of PhP 3,500.00 per month (or around PhP 84,000, more or less) as well as separation pay of one month salary for every year of service. All other awards such as salary differential, 13th month pay, and attorney's fees were deleted.
๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ ๐. ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ -๐๐ฌ, ๐๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ฆ๐, ๐๐๐ฆโ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐, ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ซ, ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐, ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ง๐ญ. (๐.๐. ๐๐จ. ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐, ๐๐๐๐)
Read the full text of the case here: https://bit.ly/SariSariStoreCase
+639205404652
© 2023 - 2025 Justitia. All Rights Reserved. Designed by HTML Codex